Featured Expert Contributors

Antitrust & Competition Policy — Federal Trade Commission

06633 - Royall, M. Sean ( Dallas )M. Sean Royall, a Partner in the Dallas, TX office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Antitrust & Competition Policy — U.S. Department of Justice

swisherAnthony W. Swisher, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Baker Botts.

Civil Justice/Class Actions

Cruz-Alvarez_FFrank Cruz-Alvarez, a Partner in the Miami, FL office of  Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Corporate Governance/Securities Law

bainbridgeStephen M. Bainbridge, William D. Warren Distinguished Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law.

Environmental Law and Policy

sboxermanSamuel B. Boxerman, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Sidley Austin LLP.

False Claims Act

Stephen_Wood_03032014Stephen A. Wood, a Principal with Chuhak & Tecson, P.C. in its Chicago, IL office, where he chairs the litigation practice group.

First Amendment

BrownMegan L. Brown, a Partner with Wiley Rein LLP in Washington, DC.

Intellectual Property — Patents

Kaminski_Jeffri_LRJeffri A. Kaminski, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Venable LLP focusing on patent prosecution and counseling.

Judicial Gatekeeping of Expert Evidence

Tager_09181Evan M. Tager, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Mayer Brown LLP.

Legal & Regulatory Challenges for Digital Assets

Alter_Daniel_web2_8784879218361Daniel S. Alter, a Shareholder in the New York, NY office of Murphy & McGonigle P.C.

Litigation Strategies

Joe_Hollingsworth_thumbnail 1Joe G. Hollingsworth, a Partner with Hollingsworth LLP in Washington, DC

Mass Torts—Asbestos

RobertWrightRobert H. Wright, a Partner with Horvitz & Levy LLP in Los Angeles, CA

White Collar Crime & Corporate Compliance

Brower_GregGregory A. Brower, a Shareholder with Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP in Las Vegas, NV and Washington, DC.

12 thoughts on “Featured Expert Contributors

  1. Pingback: Will “Sea Change” in Florida Class Action Standards Unleash Flood of Suits? | The Legal Pulse

  2. Pingback: Substantial Patent Licensing with No U.S. Manufacturing Deemed Sufficient for Remedy at US ITC | The Legal Pulse

  3. Pingback: Is Induced Patent Infringement Possible without Direct Infringement? | The Legal Pulse

  4. Pingback: Entire Federal Circuit to Review Its Deference to Trial Judges’ Patent Claim Determinations | The Legal Pulse

  5. Pingback: Supreme Court Observations: Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles | The Legal Pulse

  6. Pingback: Federal Circuit Reverses $593 Million Dollar Judgment in Stent Case | The Legal Pulse

  7. Pingback: Want Clarity on Software Patents?: Skip CLS Bank Int’l Opinion and Wait for Supreme Court Review | The Legal Pulse

  8. Pingback: Patent Litigant Targeting Retailers’ Use of Gift Card Activation Prevails in Federal Circuit | The Legal Pulse

  9. Pingback: White House Wants to Redirect Patent Litigation Costs Toward Jobs And Innovation | The Legal Pulse

  10. Pingback: U.S. Supreme Court to Rule on Class Action Fairness Act’s “Mass Action” Provision | The Legal Pulse

  11. Pingback: Gatekeeping on the Record: The Fifth Circuit Requires that “Daubert” Inquiries Be Publicly Explained – The WLF Legal Pulse

  12. Pingback: Will the California Supreme Court Address the “Every Exposure” Theory of Causation? – The WLF Legal Pulse

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s