Antitrust & Competition — Federal Trade Commission
Andrea Agathoklis Murino, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Goodwin Procter LLP
- Déjà Vu All Over Again: Federal Court Blocks Staples/Office Depot Merger
- FTC Takes Scissors to Staples/Office Depot Merger
- With Recent Use of Disgorgement, FTC Continues to Sharpen its Enforcement Tools
- Antitrust and Health Care: FTC’s Off-Again, On-Again Challenge to Georgia Hospital Merger
- Does FTC Glass Settlement Break the Efficiencies Mold?
- FTC Sets New Rules for Pharma Licenses and Antitrust Approvals
- The Many Faces of the FTC on Display in Commissioners Review of Administrative Case
- Commissioner Wright Moves to Advance Discussion on FTC Act Section 5
Antitrust & Competition — U.S. Department of Justice
Anthony W. Swisher, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.
- Divergent Philosophies on Merger Enforcement Emerge from Senior DOJ, FTC Antitrust Officials’ Speeches
Civil Justice/Class Actions
Frank Cruz-Alvarez, a Partner in the Miami, FL office of Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
- Second Circuit Upholds Decertification of Class Action After Jury Award
- Supreme Court Observations: Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo
- DirecTV Inc. v. Imburgia: The Supreme Court’s Latest Word on Arbitration and Federal Preemption
- District Court Tosses $15 Billion Facebook Tracking Class Action
- Sixth Circuit Affirms Class-Certification Order Despite Lack of Commonality
- Ninth Circuit Limits CAFA’s “Single Local Event” Exception and Broadens Removal of Mass Actions
- Eighth Circuit Creates New Class Action Fairness Act Requirement, Sends Case to State Court
- Ninth Circuit Ruling Rejecting Preemption in Food Labeling Class Action Difficult to Swallow
- Sixth Circuit Affirms Preemption Defense in Suit against Branded and Generic Drug Companies
- Third Circuit Reaffirms “Rigorous Analysis” for Ascertaining Class Members under Rule 23
- U.S. Supreme Court to Rule on Class Action Fairness Act’s “Mass Action” Provision
- Will “Sea Change” in Florida Class Action Standards Unleash Flood of Suits?
- Supreme Court Observations: Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles
Corporate Governance/Securities Law
Stephen M. Bainbridge, William D. Warren Distinguished Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law.
Environmental Law and Policy
Samuel B. Boxerman, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Sidley Austin LLP.
- Federal Court Deems “Identifiable Trifle” to Be Sufficient Harm for Environmental Citizen-Suit Standing
- No CERCLA “Arranger Liability” for Falling Air Emissions, Ninth Circuit Holds
- North Dakota First Petitioner to Challenge EPA’s Methane Rule
- Supreme Court Observations: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes, Co.
- Bureau of Land Management Proposes Rule on Oil/Gas Production on Federal Land
- District Court Enjoins Department of Interior Rule on Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands
- Citing State-Based Voluntary Conservation Efforts, Federal Court Strikes Down ESA Listing for Lesser Prairie Chicken
- Ohio Supreme Court Holds Municipal “Fracking” Regulations Cannot Conflict with State Rules
- Federal Appeals Courts Reject Clean Water Act “Permit Shield” Defense
- Supreme Court Observations: CTS Corp. v. Waldburger
- EPA Seeks Input on Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids under Toxic Substances Control Act
- Department of Energy Task Force Issues Report on FracFocus
- EPA and the Army Corps’ “Waters of the U.S.” Proposal: Will it Initiate Regulatory Overflow
- EPA Releases Final Guidance for the Use of Diesel Fuels in Hydraulic Fracturing
- Will Pennsylvania High Court’s Ruling Expose State’s Hydraulic Fracturing Rules to “Public Trust” Challenges?
Intellectual Property — Patents
Jeffri A. Kaminski, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Venable LLP focusing on patent prosecution and counseling.
- With 3 Cases on October 2016 Docket, US Supreme Court Poised to Expand Its Impact on Patent Rights
- Supreme Court Observations: Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics
- Federal Circuit Reaffirms International Trade Commission’s Authority Over Induced Patent Infringement
- Supreme Court Observations: Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC
- Supreme Court Holds that Belief Patent Is Invalid Is No Defense to Induced Infringement
- Playing Field May Continue to Shift for Patent Litigants on Willful Infringement
- Concurrence in Federal Circuit’s Ultramercial Ruling Sends Pointed Message to Patent Litigants
- Delaware Federal Court Sanction Rulings Offer Lessons for Patent Plaintiffs and Defendants
Judicial Gatekeeping of Expert Evidence
Evan M. Tager, a Partner in the Washington, DC office of Mayer Brown LLP.
- Florida Appeals Court Invokes Daubert to Reject “Every Exposure” Causation in Asbestos Case
- Using Daubert to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Use of Flawed Surveys in Civil Litigation
- When Expert Testimony “Fits” with Causation
- North Carolina Supreme Court Grudgingly Adopts Daubert Standard for Expert Evidence Review
- The First Circuit Weighs Competing Studies About Relative Risk
- Gatekeeping on the Record: The Fifth Circuit Requires that Daubert Inquiries Be Publicly Explained
Toxic Tort and Environmental Litigation
Richard O. Faulk, a Partner with Alexander Dubose Jefferson & Townsend LLP serving clients in Texas and Washington DC.
- Texas Supreme Court Restricts Scope of Common-Law Nuisance
- October 2015 Term Administrative-Law Rulings Heighten Significance of Next Supreme Court Appointment
- Eighth Circuit Properly Rejects “Fear of Nuisance” Suit Arising from Pipeline Leak
- Struggle over Federal Environmental Law Preemption of Public Nuisance Suits Heats Up in Kentucky
- There’s Nothing “New” about “Lone Pine” Orders for Active Case Management
- Dispelling the Myths of Asbestos Litigation: Bankruptcy Judge Finds that Misrepresentations Inflated Settlement Values
- Second Circuit Affirms Cost Award against Pharmaceutical Plaintiff