Featured Expert Contributor, Litigation Strategies
A printer-friendly PDF version of this commentary is available here.
Earlier this fall, the Supreme Court took up the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) when it granted certiorari in Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, 880 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 2018). We’re hoping for a slap-down because the Home Depot decision and its ilk improperly deny an entire sub-category of defendants protection from abusive state court class actions.
CAFA is an important statutory safeguard that Congress enacted to rectify serious class action abuses in state courts. See CAFA, S. Rep. No. 109-14, at 13 (2005). Congress expressly found that ungainly and abusive interstate class actions “(A) harmed class members with legitimate claims and defendants that have acted responsibly; (B) adversely affected interstate commerce; and (C) undermined public respect for our judicial system.” CAFA § 2(a)(2) (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1711 notes). Continue reading “Games People Play: Supreme Court Can Put a Stop to an Obvious CAFA Workaround”