Featured Expert Contributor, Mass Torts—Asbestos
Robert H. Wright, a Partner with Horvitz & Levy LLP in Los Angeles, CA
Plaintiffs have pushed for a rule that would hold employers liable for so-called “take home” asbestos exposures, arguing that companies that used asbestos in the workplace owe a duty not only to protect their own employees from direct exposures, but also to protect anyone who later comes into contact with those employees.
This theory of liability has been rejected in almost two-thirds of the jurisdictions to consider the issue. Fifteen states—including Arizona earlier this year—have decided defendants owe no duty of care to those claiming take-home exposure (Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas). In contrast, until recently, only eight states recognized some form of such a duty (Alabama, California, Delaware, Indiana, Louisiana, New Jersey, Tennessee, Washington).
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Virginia was confronted with the question of take-home liability in Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., No. 171494, 2018 WL 4925349 (Va. Oct. 11, 2018). Continue reading “Divided Virginia Supreme Court Decision Epitomizes National Split over “Take Home” Asbestos Liability”