Adventures in Legal Obstructionism, Part I: An Ill Wind Blows on Alternative Energy

On April 28, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar approved the development of 130 wind turbines off the coast of Massachusetts.

Ironically, the project might not go forward owing to the soon-to-be-filed lawsuits of environmental activist groups—the same groups that have long clamored for such alternative energy sources.  The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Three Bays Preservation, Animal Welfare Institute, Industrial Wind Action Group, Californians for Renewable Energy, Oceans Public Trust Initiative, and others claim that they “will not stand by and allow our treasured public lands to be marred forever by a corporate giveaway to private industrial groups.”

It seems that this project’s opponents feel wind power is a good thing, but it should be generated on somebody else’s land.  As this post by Edward John Craig so aptly points out, the complaint “is a tale of green hypocrisy and aggrieved NIMBYism.  It details the efforts of some of our favorite environmentally holier-than-thou [activists] to prevent a wind farm in Nantucket Sound.”

One wonders why Virginians or New Yorkers should be forced to erect towering white turbines if Bay Staters don’t have to do the same.

One thought on “Adventures in Legal Obstructionism, Part I: An Ill Wind Blows on Alternative Energy

  1. Pingback: Adventures in Legal Obstructionism, Part II: Activists’ Relentless Fight Against Electricity « The Legal Pulse

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s