Featured Expert Contributors

Civil Justice/Class Actions

Cruz-Alvarez_FFrank Cruz-Alvarez, Partner, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Miami office

 Antitrust & Competition — Federal Trade Commission


Andrea Agathoklis Murinoa partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Goodwin Proctor LLP

Antitrust & Competition — U.S. Department of Justice


Mark J. Botti, a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

 Complex Serial and Mass Tort Litigation

faulkRichard O. Faulk, a partner with the law firm Hollingsworth LLP and Member. Board of Overseers, Searle Civil Justice Institute, George Mason University School of Law.

Environmental Law and Policy

sboxermanSamuel B. Boxerman, a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm Sidley Austin LLP.

Intellectual Property — Patents

Kaminski_Jeffri_LRJeffri A. Kaminski, a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm Venable LLP focusing on patent prosecution and counseling.

10 thoughts on “Featured Expert Contributors

  1. Pingback: Will “Sea Change” in Florida Class Action Standards Unleash Flood of Suits? | The Legal Pulse

  2. Pingback: Substantial Patent Licensing with No U.S. Manufacturing Deemed Sufficient for Remedy at US ITC | The Legal Pulse

  3. Pingback: Is Induced Patent Infringement Possible without Direct Infringement? | The Legal Pulse

  4. Pingback: Entire Federal Circuit to Review Its Deference to Trial Judges’ Patent Claim Determinations | The Legal Pulse

  5. Pingback: Supreme Court Observations: Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles | The Legal Pulse

  6. Pingback: Federal Circuit Reverses $593 Million Dollar Judgment in Stent Case | The Legal Pulse

  7. Pingback: Want Clarity on Software Patents?: Skip CLS Bank Int’l Opinion and Wait for Supreme Court Review | The Legal Pulse

  8. Pingback: Patent Litigant Targeting Retailers’ Use of Gift Card Activation Prevails in Federal Circuit | The Legal Pulse

  9. Pingback: White House Wants to Redirect Patent Litigation Costs Toward Jobs And Innovation | The Legal Pulse

  10. Pingback: U.S. Supreme Court to Rule on Class Action Fairness Act’s “Mass Action” Provision | The Legal Pulse

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s