WLF “In All Fairness” Advertorial Appears in National Edition of New York Times

IAFMay20As part of its Eating Away Our Freedoms project, Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today placed an advertorial on the op-ed page of the National Edition of The New York Times. WLF first debuted its “In All Fairness” advertorial column in 1998 in The Times, and it has appeared on the newspaper’s op-ed page over 150 times. The Times national edition reaches 75% of America’s population and according to one survey is read by 90% of major newspaper editors.

We encourage you to peruse the Eating Away Our Freedoms site and please consider signing up to receive updates as WLF supplements the site and continues to counter those “public interest” activists, regulators, and lawyers whose approach to reducing obesity enriches them at the expense of their intended beneficiaries.

10 thoughts on “WLF “In All Fairness” Advertorial Appears in National Edition of New York Times

  1. Reblogged this on Sustaining Starter and commented:
    This advertorial was placed on the op-ed page of the NYTs on 5/20/13 by the Washington Legal Foundation (tagline, “Advocate for Freedom and Justice”). Rather than share my thoughts on this creative piece of freedom and justice advocacy, here are three reactions from good friends:
    1) “Pretty obvious where the money to fund these ads are coming from. I’m so sick and tired of the “freedom” marketing because the companies behind it are the ones taking away any type of choice. lskdjfslkdjflksdjalksdj.”
    2) “I like how they condemn alarming catchy phrases and use the term “self-appointed diet overlords” in the same paragraph.”
    3) “I’m guessing these guys just pulled their pro-smoking file and just pressed control replace cancer with obesity.”

    Ok I will share just one thought. “The purported goal — reducing obesity — may be worthy, but their misguided approach will only succeed in enriching these self-appointed diet overlords at the expense of American consumers and their health.” As a self-appointed diet overlord, I just want to say that when I read that sentence, and then I look at my paycheck, I get a little bummed out that other self-appointed diet overlords might be getting more enriched than I am. I know it is wrong to covet another diet overlord’s income, but here I am wondering if I shouldn’t be charging more per condescending demonization and request tips next time I knock someone’s freedom soda out of their hand and shout “fat bomb” while trolling mall cafeterias. Maybe its time to rethink my pricing structure; “Let’s Sue!” bumper stickers don’t grow on trees, after all.

  2. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards

  3. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards » Diet Dummy

  4. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | 1freelancers.com

  5. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | jobpro.eu

  6. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | postcv.eu

  7. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | carstop.eu

  8. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | jobsguru.eu

  9. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | 1tourism.com

  10. Pingback: “Diet Overlords” vs. Legal Overlards | eboyslive.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s